Connect with us


New IRS Tax Disclosure Form Puts Cryptocurrencies Front and Center 




Cryptocurrencies’ role in tax across the United States has been a hot-button issue for a while now. In its recent move to bring the industry under control, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently published a new draft for Form 1040, which would consider whether taxpayers have dealt in cryptocurrencies in the past year.

Questions on Crypto Relations

The draft, which was published on Wednesday, features a direct question in its early pages: 

“At any time during 2020, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?”

While it’s unclear how the tax agency plans to address the issue of people who have had contact with cryptocurrencies, it’s an indication that it now takes the issue of crypto taxation seriously.

The IRS’s Quest for Crypto Tax Compliance

The IRS’s record on cryptocurrencies has been a bit of a mixed one. For one, the agency hasn’t made much in terms of measurable progress. On the other hand, it has shown a proclivity in taking crypto taxation seriously.

So far, the IRS has shown a desire to track activities in just about every aspect of the industry. Last month, it published a request for information where it sought information and tools that would help it trace transactions using privacy coins, layer-two protocols, and side chains.

The document, which came from the IRS’ Criminal Investigation Division, sought proposals for tools that include graphical user interfaces for analyzing ledger-based transactions with privacy-enhancing blockchain technologies. It explicitly named Monero, Zcash, Komodo, DASH, GRIN, and Verge as the assets that the IRS is hoping to target, as well as layer-two solutions like Lightning, Celer, and Raiden Networks.

Despite the challenge of tracking privacy coins, the agency believes that it would only be right if its ability to trace transactions extends to every cryptocurrency. This way, crypto holders won’t have a reason to evade taxes using the assets.

The agency has also gone after staking rewards — a move that immediately drew pushback from some pro-crypto Congress members. In response to the agency’s focus on staking rewards, Representatives Darren Soto (D-FL), Tom Emmer (R-MN), Bill Foster (D-IL), and David Schweikert (R-AZ) wrote to the agency. In their letter, they explained that the IRS ran the risk of overstating the rewards from staking. If this happens, it would invariably charge crypto holders more in taxes.

Despite all this, the IRS seems determined in its mission to achieve sweeping crypto tax compliance. The agency has even sought help from some members of the crypto industry. In June, The Block reported that top crypto exchange Coinbase had inked a deal to sell its analytics software to several government agencies – including the IRS and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

Documents gotten by the news source showed that the IRS was interested in Coinbase Analytics and Neutrino, an intelligence agency that the San Francisco-based exchange purchased in 2019. Many immediately reacted to the news, with some claiming that they’d delete their Coinbase accounts if a deal went through.



Bolivia Essentially Banned Crypto but Blockchain Advocates Are Pushing Back




Earlier this year, Bolivian blockchain engineer Mario Blacutt – previously known in crypto circles only as “Berzeck” –finally felt safe enough to reveal his name and come out as the creator of a new blockchain network. 

Blacutt let down his guard after the left-wing government that had banned crypto fell in November 2019, and its leader, Evo Morales, fled to Mexico

A year earlier, Blacutt had his bank accounts shut down and his credit card taken away. The banks cited a directive put out by Bolivia’s central bank (BCB) in 2014 prohibiting virtual currencies, and flagged funds received in Blacutt’s accounts via crypto exchanges Bitstamp and Bitinka. Blacutt was paid in cryptocurrency.

“They said it was to protect me. This is a funny thing,” Blacutt said.

Even as many governments around the world embrace or at least regulate cryptocurrency, Bolivia is one of the rare countries that tried to stamp it out entirely. 

A 2014 central bank circular technically only prohibited the use of crypto by banks and in commercial transactions or payments. But in 2017, Bolivian authorities arrested 60 individuals who were allegedly “undergoing training related to the investment of money in cryptocurrencies,” according to a statement released by the country’s financial authority ASFI. 

So when Morales fled, Blacutt felt more at ease. “After he was ousted, I was more free to use my identity because I was optimistic that things were finally changing,” he told CoinDesk. 

But now, Morales is back.

In the balance

The right-wing regime that replaced the Morales regime has quickly become unpopular as Bolivia’s economy suffers during the coronavirus pandemic. 

Luis Arce, former economic minister to Morales, won the presidency in a landslide, restoring the socialist government to power; last month, the exiled Morales made a triumphant return to Bolivia.

Now, many things hang in the balance, including crypto. 

Alberto Bonadona, senior economist and emeritus professor at Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (UMSA) in Bolivia told CoinDesk the current government is unlikely to reverse the crypto ban.

“All these kinds of cryptocurrencies are not quite welcome in Bolivia,” Bonadona said.

Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are still widely viewed with skepticism in Bolivia, and adoption is slow compared to other Latin American countries like Mexico or Venezuela

Although Blacutt doesn’t believe he’s in any real danger, the return of the socialist government, he said, may put crypto enthusiasts in a “difficult position.” 

But a growing community of advocates including Bolivian software engineers, entrepreneurs and developers are determined to change the government’s position.

Even though policy remains unchanged, sentiment may be changing, albeit slowly. The interim government that came to power after Morales’ exit did not lift the ban, but the blockchain community visibly grew this year. Bolivian users only traded a monthly average of $21,330 on peer-to-peer exchange Paxful, but the platform saw a 570% increase in trading volume compared to 2019, while new user registrations went up by 230%. 

LocalBitcoins saw over 450% growth in trading volumes between January and September 2020, recording an all-time daily high of $17,000 on Sept. 2. 

Why ban crypto? 

In 2014, Bolivian software engineer Gabriela Melendrez was writing her undergraduate thesis on blockchain technology when the country’s central bank (BCB) issued the directive banning the use of “any kind of currency that is not issued and controlled by a government or an authorized entity.”

The directive was the first of its kind from a South American nation, and named a range of virtual currencies including bitcoin, namecoin, devcoin, quark and others as currencies that “do not belong to any state, country or economic zone” because they can cause losses to their holders.

Melendrez interviewed BCB personnel following the ban.

“The resolution was born to protect the population against pyramid schemes, Ponzi schemes and things like that. That was the answer they gave me,” Melendrez told CoinDesk via Telegram.

The 2017 statement by the ASFI reminded the citizens of Bolivia that this type of activity is prohibited across the nation because they may seek to trick Bolivians into losing their money and savings.   

The central bank and ASFI did not respond to requests for comment by press time.

Blacutt confirmed the government was nervous about scams and the use of cryptocurrencies to fund criminal activities. But that was only part of the story. 

The BCB statement also said the ban is necessary to ensure the stability and purchasing power of the national currency, the boliviano. 

When the socialist government came to power in October, the country’s foreign reserves fell to a record low, the lowest in 13 years, down $1.3 billion since September. Wealthy Bolivians had begun sending money abroad, fearing President Arce’s promised wealth tax on millionaires. 

Cryptocurrencies “could help people to take money out of the economy. Right now, they’re trying to stop that,” Bonadona said. 

An uneasy fit 

When systems engineer Alvaro Guzman first heard about bitcoin back in 2013, he stayed up all night discussing the possible applications of blockchain in Bolivia.

“The first area I saw is, of course, an alternative to traditional banking. The second and very interesting area of development is on transparency,” Guzman told CoinDesk, citing claims of fraud that surrounded Morales’ fourth-term election last year, which led to his eventual resignation.

Guzman suggested that blockchain-based banking and cryptocurrencies can offer a viable alternative to traditional financial services in the country for a number of reasons, one being its high unbanked population. 

According to World Bank statistics, in 2017, 46% of Bolivian adults did not have a bank account while only 7% of adults had a credit card. For comparison, 29% of Venezuelan adults claimed to own a credit card in 2017.

Bolivia has a very large, informal economy that is not taxed or regulated by the government, Guzman said. In fact, it is the largest informal economy in the world, according to the International Monetary Fund. 

While a cash-driven economy and large unbanked population are driving crypto adoption in Mexico, Bolivia doesn’t seem to be showing the same momentum or interest in digital assets. 

Bonadona said the government and most Bolivians still view bitcoin as an instrument for speculation as opposed to a reserve or currency that can be used for international transactions. 

In Bolivia, Bonadona added, speculative investment instruments are not all the rage. According to the 2020 Investment Climate Statement by the U.S. Department of State, the Bolivian stock exchange (BBV) is very small, with more than 95% of transactions concentrated in bonds and debt instruments.

“There is the idea that basically this is a bubble and somehow, in some time, it will explode and won’t do any good for anybody who invested in it,” Bonadona said. 

Persistent advocates

Although it may have looked like an outright ban on the usage of crypto, Blacutt and Guzman agree that the 2014 central bank directive did not ban owning or trading crypto on exchanges, but only limited paying for goods and services with cryptocurrencies (hence keeping it out of circulation) and prohibited banks from transacting with them. 

The ban is very specific in saying that Bolivia is not allowing commercial transactions using a currency that’s not issued by the central bank, Guzman said, adding that he can’t go out and buy a burger or a car with bitcoin. 

“But that’s the only thing that they have written in the law. … The problem is that in practice, if you promote bitcoin, they can arrest you,” Blacutt said. 

Despite the ban, and the authorities’ somewhat haphazard interpretation of it, blockchain believers powered ahead through the Morales regime and seemed undeterred by the Socialist party’s return to power. 

“Technology is always one step ahead of legislation,” Guzman said. 

After the ban was implemented, crypto enthusiasts formed networks that traded in cash underground, making themselves invisible to the government, Guzman added.

According to blockchain developer Huascar Miranda Martinez, few Bolivians trade on peer-to-peer platforms like LocalBitcoins and even less use exchanges like Binance (where they are not allowed to trade with a Bolivian credit card), although that number is slowly growing. People mostly trade bitcoin in person to avoid interactions with banks: Buyers and sellers agree on prices in WhatsApp groups or other social media networks, and meet at restaurants or cafes to exchange bitcoin wallet addresses for cash.

“The bank prohibition is not a problem for us. It’s a problem for the bank,” Martinez said. 

To avoid getting flagged by banks, Guzman said people are now careful about how much money they transfer from wallets or exchanges, and make sure banks are not used in a way that breaks the law. 

“Basically, the only thing that the bank can do is say, hey, you’re getting $70,000? Who sent this money? How did you get it? And depending on the response, and the amount, the bank can follow up with an investigation and look for the source,” Guzman said. 

Road to adoption

Bolivia is in recession, compounded by the COVID-19 health crisis. Its economy is projected to contract by 7.3% this year, according to the World Bank. Although the pandemic’s economic fallout is driving crypto adoption in countries like Nigeria, where a tech-savvy population is increasingly using bitcoin as a hedge against inflation, in Bolivia people still seem to prefer physical assets like jewelry or cash.  

Guzman says this may have to do with a lack of knowledge of digital currency. Even if Bolivians buy things online, people still end up paying in cash, Guzman said, either on delivery or using a third party.

Bolivia’s blockchain activists aim to communicate with both the people and the government, helping them understand the broader applications of blockchain technology, Melendrez said.

Melendrez works with various crypto projects and founded Bolivian Mind Blockchain, a platform for learning and sharing knowledge about the technology. 

“Nowadays we are working on education and presenting projects that could help our society understand the technology,” Melendrez said. 

She eventually met Guzman, who was hosting meetings over beer to talk about community interest in cryptocurrencies. Lately, and more urgently, Guzman has been meeting with former lawmakers and experts to find ways to open a discussion with the government. 

Meanwhile, blockchain projects are slowly coming out of the woodwork: A Bolivian cattle ranch is to be tokenized so investors can trade physical assets digitally, and a blockchain advocate Carlos Rodrigo, has created a gold tokenization project

“I want to launch the project, and use that to show the government how we can raise capital in order to expand natural resources in our country with the private sector,” Rodrigo said. 

Rodrigo is hopeful the government will reverse the ban. Eventually, he said, “they’re going to do it.”



Continue Reading


‘We’re Very Focused on Not Killing’ Bitcoin – Acting OCC Chief Brooks

Brooks’s comments come amid speculation of strict crypto-related regulations pertaining particularly to self-hosted wallets. “Nobody’s Going to Ban Bitcoin” In an interview with CNBC on Dec. 4, Brooks downplayed fears of a possible blanket crypto ban in the US. According to the Acting Comptroller of the Currency, the focus for regulators is not in enacting … Continued

The post ‘We’re Very Focused on Not Killing’ Bitcoin – Acting OCC Chief Brooks appeared first on BeInCrypto.




Brian Brooks, acting head of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) says regulators are not out to “kill” Bitcoin (BTC).

Brooks’s comments come amid speculation of strict crypto-related regulations pertaining particularly to self-hosted wallets.

“Nobody’s Going to Ban Bitcoin”

In an interview with CNBC on Dec. 4, Brooks downplayed fears of a possible blanket crypto ban in the US. According to the Acting Comptroller of the Currency, the focus for regulators is not in enacting more regulations but in creating a conducive environment for the technology to flourish.

Brooks added:

“We are very focused on getting this [crypto regulations] right. We’re very focused on not killing this [Bitcoin and cryptos].”

Back in November, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong claimed that the US Treasury was looking to rush through regulations targeted at non-custodial wallets.

While alluding to the possibility of Trump-era crypto regulations coming within the closing stages of the current administration, Brooks, a one-time chief legal officer at Coinbase remarked that these laws would seek to balance out concerns for all stakeholders.

Apart from Armstrong’s warnings, the US crypto space has also been rocked with stablecoin regulatory discussions in Congress. The latest Congressional bill seeks to mandate Federal approval for stablecoin issuers.

Legal Clarity and Robust AML Compliance

For Brooks, the concern for regulators should revolve around legal clarity for cryptos as well as strict compliance to anti-money laundering (AML) standards. Commenting on the need for greater clarity, the acting OCC chief opined:

“What we do need is clarity about what is allowed, and so we need some guidance for example whether banks can connect directly to blockchains as payment networks–the answer has to be yes.”

As previously reported by BeInCrypto, the OCC has already approved some Federally-chartered banks to provide custody for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. According to Brooks, the move is indicative of the type of clarity required by the industry as a whole.

Commenting further, the OCC chief remarked that greater clarity would enable investors more freedom to participate in the market. For Brooks, crypto may have been a bubble back in 2017-2018, but the asset class is showing signs of maturing that should attract significant institutional interest.

Indeed, the current consensus is that big-money players are at the heart of the prevailing bullishness in the Bitcoin and crypto market. Reports indicate that companies now own almost 1 million BTC, which amounts to ~$16 billion at current prices.

Share Article

Osato is a reporter at BeInCrypto and Bitcoin believer based in Lagos, Nigeria. When not immersed in the daily happenings in the crypto scene, he can be found watching historical documentaries or trying to beat his Scrabble high score.

Follow Author


Continue Reading


Ethereum Transaction Volumes Hit $41 Billion in November

Decentralized finance platforms were responsible for 99% of Ethereum transaction volume last month, says DappRadar.




In brief

  • Ethereum transaction volume amounted to $41 billion in November, according to DappRadar’s monthly report.
  • The total value locked in decentralized finance projects surpassed $13 billion.
  • At the same time, Ethereum users’ activity declined compared to October.

November has been a turbulent month for Ethereum’s (ETH) decentralized applications (dapps) as all public attention was riveted to the long-awaited launch of ETH 2.0.

On one hand, the total value locked (TVL) in dapps surged to more than $13 billion, on the other—user activity declined in comparison to October, according to DappRadar’s monthly report published yesterday.

Per the report, while the TVL surpassed $13 billion, it was in big part due to the price volatility of Ethereum and other altcoins. The adjusted TVL (where price increases weren’t taken into account) amounted to around $11 billion in November.

Ethereum transaction volume increased by 1,784% year-on-year (i.e. compared to the same time period in 2019) but have dropped by 12% since October, amounting to over $41 billion. Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms were responsible for 99% of this volume.

Ethereum transaction volume reached $41 billion in November. Image: DappRadar

Simultaneously, the price of ETH token reached its highest level this year, rising to nearly $600 by the end of November. However, despite the positive backdrop on the eve of Ethereum 2.0 launch, gas prices remained a “major network issue” for Ethereum, averaging to around 55 Gwei, the report noted.

Likewise, the total number of active daily wallets dropped by 19% compared to October—from 54,000 to 45,600.

“While overall activity mostly decreased in the DeFi dapp ecosystem in terms of headline figures there were still important events taking place. Important mergers happened during November,” the researchers noted.

The number of daily active wallets decreased in November. Image: DappRadar

Namely, popular DeFi platform Yearn Finance partnered or merged with several other projects in the space, including SushiSwap, Akropolis, Cover, Cream, and Pickle. DappRadar asserted that “the merge might result in increased activity within the category in the future.”

Technical vulnerabilities proved to be another pain point of DeFi, “undermining confidence in the sector’s security.” As Decrypt has noted, several DeFi projects have become victims of hackers recently, including Pickle Finance (hacked for $20 million) and Value DeFi (hacked for $6 million). And such flash loan attacks will only get worse, experts warn.

DappRadar said, “To conclude, November was all about Ethereum 2.0 news and speculation, token price growth, and increased TVL. Although transaction volume and daily active wallets decreased during November. We believe that improved results lie ahead for Ethereum.”

Continue Reading
Blockchain1 day ago

Spotify Thinking of Accepting Bitcoin

Blockchain1 day ago

Litecoin, Cosmos, Dogecoin Price Analysis: 03 December

Blockchain3 days ago

Greenheart Punt World Debut on DigiFinex

Blockchain5 days ago

Coinbase unwilling to participate in Spark’s airdrop

Blockchain2 days ago

IlCOIN Launches Blockchain-Powered VR First on Steam

Blockchain3 days ago

Mining City: A Blueprint for Success?

Blockchain4 days ago

Yearn Finance Continues Growing with Latest DeFi Acquisitions

Blockchain5 days ago

Curve Finance to Distribute Almost $3 Million in Fees

Blockchain5 days ago

Wall Street Giant Guggenheim Fund Seeks SEC Approval to Buy Bitcoin Worth up to $500 Million

Blockchain4 days ago

Golff Vault 2.0’s New Launch – One-Stop Services Encrypted Bank

Blockchain4 days ago

Bitcoin, Ether, and XRP Weekly Market Update November 30, 2020

Blockchain5 days ago

Editorial: Why the 2020 Bitcoin Bull Run Ain’t Over Yet?

Blockchain5 days ago

UAE, Saudi Arabian central banks release report on Project Aber CBDC trial

Blockchain4 days ago

J.P. Morgan Analysts Foreshadow Further Bitcoin Declines

Blockchain4 days ago

BREAKING: Bitcoin Miners in China’s Yunnan Province Cut off from Electricity Supply

Blockchain5 days ago

Bitcoin SV, Maker, Ethereum Classic Price Analysis: 29 November

Blockchain3 days ago

Facebook Libra changes name to Diem

Blockchain5 days ago

Visa CEO Alfred Kelly: ‘We Are Very Interested in Cryptocurrencies’

Blockchain5 days ago

Ripple Plans To Cash Out 33% Of Its MoneyGram Stake With A Significant Profit

Blockchain4 days ago

Nicholas Baumer Appointed Chief Marketing Officer by Tickmill

Blockchain4 days ago

TRON’s BitTorrent Partnered with Huawei

Blockchain5 days ago

Guggenheim Funds Intends $500 Million BTC Investment

Blockchain5 days ago

Former Goldman Sachs VP Explains Why Bitcoin Price Could Reach $500,000 by 2030

Blockchain5 days ago

South Korea To Postpone Previously Planned Crypto Income Tax

Blockchain4 days ago

SEC Letter Reveals China’s Crypto Ambitions Threaten US

Blockchain4 days ago

FCA Exposes 4TFX as Crackdown on Clone Scams Continues

Blockchain4 days ago

5 Reasons Why Bitcoin Just Hit an All-Time High Price

Blockchain5 days ago

South Korea To Postpone Previously Planned Crypto Income Tax

Blockchain5 days ago

Bitcoin Cash Price Prediction: BCH/USD Stays Above $280; the Bulls May Regain the Ground

Blockchain4 days ago

Ethereum Classic Hashrate Rises Following Successful Thanos Hardfork

Blockchain5 days ago

Ripple Plans To Cash Out 33% Of Its MoneyGram Stake With A Significant Profit

Blockchain5 days ago

Bitcoin Continues to Stay Strong Thanks to PayPal

Blockchain4 days ago

After Lightning-Paced Tier-1 Sellout, ClinTex’s CTi Token Lists on KuCoin Today

Blockchain4 days ago

$100 Million in Bitcoin From Bitfinex Hack Has Moved

Blockchain5 days ago

South Korea To Postpone Previously Planned Crypto Income Tax

Blockchain5 days ago

What Biden’s Pick for Treasury Secretary Has Said About Bitcoin and Blockchain

Blockchain5 days ago

Pizza Hut to accept Bitcoin for pies in Venezuela

Blockchain4 days ago

Crypto Market Cap Gained $30 Billion While BTC Eyes $19K

Blockchain4 days ago

Nearly $100 million in bitcoin tied to 2016 Bitfinex hack has been moved