Connect with us


The Entertainment Industry Meets Blockchain



These days, it seems, Blockchain is making its way into most
industries. Every other day, a new blockchain project is announced, usually
trying to give the technology yet another novel use. While many of these
enterprises are doomed to fail, others surely won’t. In a few years, many
markets would have been transformed by the immutable ledger.

One of the markets where there are still very few blockchain
proposals, yet where it could help the most, is entertainment. Once the private
playground of a few executives who acted as gatekeepers, this industry has
slowly been opening up over the last two decades.

Blockchain, as it happens, could be the technology to finally
make it change for good. There are several so far proposed uses that are worth
looking into.

distribution of earnings

This is the biggest one. It’s also likely the reason why the
industry so far isn’t looking into blockchain. And the reason why it is likely
to fight any blockchain initiative harder than they the Netflix (which it

In essence, with the blockchain revolution;
actors, singers, and all kinds of content creators can be sure they’re not
being robbed. In an industry known for its creative accounting, it would be
expected for those in suits to dismiss any initiatives towards transparency.

After all, the status quo in Hollywood is that it is a handful of people make lots of money with the work of many people. The excuse is that they have the money to make it happen, which is true. But this select class has the money to make it happen on the backs of fraud and cooking the books.

Did you know, for example, that according to Warner Brothers
“Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” was a complete financial failure?
That didn’t keep them from making three more films in the franchise, though. It
also hasn’t made them go bankrupt for some reason.

Bringing an end to creative accounting by having immutable, public ledgers is the great idea that’s unlikely to happen. Transparency would kill the entertainment industry as we know it, for it is built upon embezzling and misreporting.

Were this to happen, though, it would affect more than just
those working in Hollywood. Plenty of websites operate in semi-open ways today,
allowing for user-created content. YouTube has made a fortune with it, for
example. Sam story with Soundcloud.

However, content creators are often faced with their earnings
being too low. While some content creators indeed expect too much, it’s often
difficult to know whether a site is misreporting sales or views. There’s no way
to audit the industry’s data.

Which leads us to another feature that will drive blockchain adoption.

trustworthy data

All we know about a product’s audience comes from the ones in
charge of the product. This means that, when certain data isn’t convenient,
they can withhold it or outright lie about it. And there’s no way to know if
it’s true.

For decades, the TV business depended on Nielsen to know about ratings.
This at least gave an estimate of ratings that couldn’t be manipulated by TV
stations. Just as well, cinemas depended on box office scores, and the music
industry on album sales.

That’s not the case today.

Streaming and digital media have brought amazingly convenient
ways to consume our media. We can access it when we want, where we want, and
just with one click.

We also have no way to know how many people are watching, or
listening to, what. Even content creators can’t know for sure. They receive
monthly reports, but there’s no way to audit them – which means stores can
quite easily cook the books and leave no trace.

On top of that, digital sales and distribution contracts
often shortchange the artists, even when they’re the ones who drive sales.
Taylor Swift went on a crusade against Spotify
over royalties. Jay-Z bought Tidal to try and shape it to be fairer. On the TV
front, Netflix hides viewing numbers for its shows even from its own creators.
The absurdly secretive company, it can be argued, does this so it gains more
leverage when renegotiating contracts.

In other words, it’s not a transparent industry. These are
the cases of high-profile people being hit by this, smaller content creators
could well be hit much worse. It’s also impossible to know if YouTube tells the
truth with its views count, for example.

Blockchain could put an end to all this. With an immutable
ledger, proper viewing and download counters could be a reality. Since this
info would be public (and why couldn’t it be?) content creators would have no
reasons to doubt numbers. We would know the truth about the market at all
times. It could even be used to track the cost and earnings of media, so that
creative accounting is kept at bay.

Of course, that’s precisely why it isn’t likely to happen.
Transparency is too much for an industry built in obscurity. An industry that,
also, often uses this obscurity to justify absurd or unfair decisions.

copyright and automatically distributing royalties

This is one front where we might actually see some movement.
In an industry that somehow prides itself for ridiculous copyright length, it
can be very difficult to know who owns what in a few decades after the fact.
Companies are bought or go bankrupt, creators die, and often, genuine info on
who owns copyright is lost.

By using smart contracts on blockchain,
that could be eliminated. There would be no need to know who owns what, since
royalty fees would be automatically charged and distributed. Whenever the
rights over a product changed hands, the smart contract would be immediately

This is important, because there are lots of media in limbo
due to unknown copyright owners. In video games, for example, it’s a sadly common situation.
It’s not as common in music or media, thanks to the tight control by
corporations on the market, but it still does happen. Securing the rights to a
song can at times be extremely difficult.

By having fees for rights that are automatically awarded and
distributed, we could skip this. We’d just have to point out what we’re using,
and the blockchain would take over. Moreover, we could actively know when
copyrights expire – and once those dates arrive, the blockchain would mark such
media as free.

upgrades that are unlikely

As mentioned before, most of these uses are unlikely to ever
happen. It would take a major blockchain technology investment
by a new player with money to make a change in the industry. We would require a
company with means to transform the market in the way Netflix did a decade ago.

However, not all is lost. While the chance of Netflix ever
releasing proper viewership numbers or Spotify allowing us to audit its numbers
is low, blockchain could well make a difference. And it’s quite likely we’ll
see blockchain-based media distributors, even they’re mostly independent ones.


The issue with Hollywood, of course, is that it’s set on its
ways. It took a long while to allow streaming. An even longer while to assure
that TV could have the same, or even better, quality than film. Many still argue those two

Still, we can only hope that blockchain adoption in the entertainment industry occurs soon enough. We can only hope whenever it does, it does so in a massively disruptive way that forces the whole industry to change for the better.

About Stevan Mcgrath,

Stevan Mcgrath, is a Bitcoin and cryptocurrency enthusiast, passionate about the potential these tools and blockchain technology bring to the world and writes consistently for CoinReview. He has been following the development of blockchain for several years. To know his work and more details you can follow him on Twitter, Linkedin.

The post The Entertainment Industry Meets Blockchain appeared first on Web's Most Useful Blockchain Articles.



Why We Get Obsessed With Bitcoin

Bitcoin can be addictive—but what sparks that initial obsession? Here’s why people become Bitcoiners, from the minds of those most hooked.



You’ve probably seen the comic posted in one of the many online crypto communities; an adaptation of a popular Reddit meme. A jolly little character offers up two games, one adventurous, the other challenging.

His friend asks about a third option.

A comic that is surprisingly relatable. Image: Reddit.

“When you play that game,” the first little guy replies, “days will blur together. Regular meals are a thing of the past. Friends will become concerned. And the whole time you’ll be unsure if you’re even having fun.”

That third game is, of course, Bitcoin.

That comic is familiar to those of us in the crypto industry. From traders staying up until the early hours, to crypto journalists working day and night to cover the fast-growing space, we all relate to it and that’s why it makes us laugh.

But what is it about Bitcoin that initially grabs us and sends us down the rabbit hole? Why do these lines of code reach out of the computer screen, grab our imaginations and pull us in?

During four interviews, with diehard Bitcoiners, Decrypt identified some common traits: a dislike for authority, with a political stance that leans towards libertarianism. But while they revel in Bitcoin’s attributes as a hedge against inflation, or its security, it wasn’t those factors that initially drew them in. Rather, it was the moment they first used Bitcoin or were able to visualise it, that flicked a subliminal switch. So, while the current narratives are important, what gets us obsessed with Bitcoin is something a little more intimate.

“A weapon for peace”

On a day in September 2015, David Bennett, senior administrator at the Texas Tech University, felt confined.

He was at work in his cubicle, lit by a lamp instead of the overhead fluorescent lights that were never turned on. The office was so buried in the middle of the gray, chunky concrete building that was the university’s library, he couldn’t even hear it when it rained—an event that, in the southern end of the High Plains desert landscape, would typically bring everyone running to the windows.

The library at the Texas Tech University. Image: Texas Tech University.

Bennett looked at his monitor. He was just about to send 0.2 Bitcoin, worth $80, from his Coinbase account to Jack Spirko of the Survival Podcast, so he could become a member. He had heard about Bitcoin online a few years ago, but it was only from listening to these podcasts that he was starting to learn more. He popped in Spirko’s address and hit send.

It quickly dawned on him that there were so many things he hadn’t done. He hadn’t put in his bank account details, his home address, his telephone number. He hadn’t authorised someone to take payments from his account. There would be no phoning the bank up to complain that further scam payments had been taken from his account. That was it, done.

He felt liberated.

“That started the whole trip down the rabbit hole,” he told Decrypt. “I sat back. I didn’t say anything then, but later told my co-workers about Bitcoin.”

Andreas Antonopoulos is a Bitcoin educator:

Bennett soon became a regular listener of Bitcoin educator Andreas Antonopoulos as well as Trace Mayer’s weekly Bitcoin Knowledge podcast. Finding himself ill-content with just one podcast episode every week, he set up his own called “Bitcoin and …” where he discusses news on a daily basis.

To this day, he continues to maintain that Bitcoin is a weapon, but, in the words of Parallax Digital CEO Robert Breedlove, one for peace.

“Bitcoin is FU money”

It was a cold day in late October, 2019, when Phil Gibson, a software salesman, drove home for his lunch hour. His friend had convinced him to buy a range of altcoins, such as the Brave browser’s Basic Attention Token and business-focused Syscoin, on crypto exchange Binance. Only the friend had warned him to get a VPN first.

Standing at the kitchen table with his laptop out, Gibson tried paying for NordVPN. But his debit card refused to work, flagging an error message. He tried his credit card. Still no dice. He got on the phone to his bank, to find out what was going on. While he was waiting on hold, it dawned on him that it was probably to do with what he was buying. The customer service assistant came back on and confirmed his suspicions.

Gibson was angry that the bank was banning him from spending his money how he wanted. He ignored the idea of calling his local branch and looked for another way. He noticed the VPN provider accepted Bitcoin, so he took out CashApp, bought Bitcoin and paid for the VPN directly.

“Once I saw that it worked, it was just amazing,” he said. “Bitcoin is FU money—it’s a hell of a drug.”

Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency—and it still has the highest market cap. Image: Shutterstock.

While he had heard about Bitcoin in 2017 during its epic run to $20,000, this was the moment he truly understood its value. It slotted straight into his libertarian-leaning beliefs and he started binging Bitcoin information, such as the Bitcoin audible podcast by Guy Swann.

But there was one thing about Bitcoin that—unlike the fiat money he had in his bank account—really resonated with him.

“It’s mine,” he said. “Even if I sound like Gollum.”

“It sort of clicked”

Economics student Marty Bent was sitting alone in the library of DePaul University in Chicago, one evening in the summer of 2012. Outside of his evening classes, he had spent the day working at a managed futures fund where he wrote almost exclusively about central banks and monetary policy. With his anti-authority bent, it was clear to him that governments were getting it all wrong.

“I was pretty glued to what the central banks were doing for three to four years. In the depths of QE2, QE3, Operation Twist, I quickly learned the central banks didn’t really have any idea of what they were doing,” he said, referring to examples of quantitative easing and bond buying by the Federal Reserve.

Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve, has called for more economic stimulus. Image: Federal Reserve.

In that moment, he wasn’t studying for his economics lessons the next evening, nor was he preparing for the next day’s commentary at his day job. Instead, he was on BitcoinTalk, poring over everything there was to know about Bitcoin.

Bent said, “I was reading up on Bitcoin and getting a better understanding of the technology and the monetary policies behind it—and it sort of clicked.”

Bent soon started making Twitter lists of prominent Bitcoiners to keep track of what was going on. In the winter of 2013, he used his bonus check to buy his first Bitcoin for $800. Soon after that, it shot up to $1,200 and, driven by the feeling of euphoria, he was suddenly telling his coworkers all about it.

Bent now writes a daily newsletter called Marty’s Ƀent and is host of the Tales from the Crypt podcast. Both of which are focused, as you might expect, on Bitcoin.

A “lightbulb moment”

In early 2017, Robert Breedlove was in his home office in Las Vegas, reading a paper on his iMac. Breedlove was a libertarian who had long wondered about money—what it was, and why governments had a monopoly on it. He had read a book called The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, and one Christmas, he had even handed out copies of an abridged version—called Dishonest Money—to his family.

So, it’s unsurprising that, at that very moment, he was reading Nick Szabo’s explanation of smart contracts, a technology for coding agreements between two parties. Breedlove had known about Bitcoin for several years but it was at this moment, when he finally got what it was for.

Nick Szabo, inventor of BitGold. Image: Decrypt

“When i read Nick Szabo’s work on smart contracts—which was actually written in the late 90s—that was when I had my lightbulb moment,” he said. “Oh my gosh, this whole finance industry is basically this intermediate function that could be disrupted by smart contracts.”

It was Szabo’s example of a vending machine that struck him. “A canonical real-life example, which we might consider to be the primitive ancestor of smart contracts, is the humble vending machine,” Szabo wrote.

At that moment, Breedlove could visualize how Bitcoin or Ethereum could play the part of the vending machine, removing the need for the legacy finance industry—while rivalling state-backed fiat currencies. “That’s when I realised that the tech was really going to be a big deal,” he said.

He soon came to believe that it was Bitcoin that had the strongest foundation to disrupt the concept of money. After reading The Bitcoin Standard, by Saifedean Ammous, he devoured books by economists Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard and Friedrich Hayek. He went on to become the CEO of Parallax Digital, which invests in Bitcoin-focused products, and has written a 62-tweet-long thread that sheds light on Bitcoin “in an exoteric nutshell.”

Continue Reading


Simplex Debuts Fiat On-Ramp for Blockchain Game Townstar



Fiat on-ramp service Simplex has partnered with crypto exchange platform Bitrue to enable GALA token trading. GALA is the native token of the Gala Games environment.

Blockchain technology continues to see increased utilization in the gaming industry with the novel tech providing a robust base layer for monetizing in-game assets. Developers are also able to leverage decentralized ledger technology (DLT) in maintaining full control of their digital metaverses without recourse to third-party publishers and hosting services.

Simplex and Bitrue Partner for GALA Trading

According to a press release shared with Blockonomi, Simplex is now providing a fiat on-ramp for the purchase and sale of GALA tokens via a collaboration with Bitrue crypto exchange. GALA which is an ERC-20 token can be traded inside Townstar, a blockchain-based game developed Zynga co-founder Eric Schiermeyer.

By providing a fiat gateway for GALA token trading Simplex is broadening the utility for the token. GALA tokens were previously only used as a reward for running a Gala Games Soft Node.

Commenting on the implication of broadening the utility for GALA tokens, Simplex CEO Nimrod Lehavi remarked:

We’re excited to announce our partnership with GALA, who are leading the way in connecting crypto and casual games. Casual games are an innovative application that will open up the ecosystem to many new users. Simplex is thrilled to work alongside GALA and Bitrue to enable billions of people to easily and securely onramp to the community.

By introducing a token economy for GALA “coins,” Simplex and Bitrue might be creating an avenue for expanding the adoption of crypto and blockchain in the gaming space. Such a trend may also be net positive for the blockchain industry as the gaming arena offers another expansion vector for the nascent technology.

Simplex continues to provide fiat on-ramps for numerous cryptocurrencies. As previously reported by Blockonomi, the company removed know-your-customer (KYC) verification requirement for transactions below $150 back in May.

Blockchain and In-game Token Monetization

Trading in-game assets is only one of the developmental activities occurring within the intersection of the blockchain and gaming industries. With advancements in supporting protocols like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality, gaming enthusiasts can now enjoy truly immersive and interactive virtual worlds on their favorite titles.

Blockchain and crypto offer a viable path to monetizing the gaming industry where in-game assets can now economic value in the real-world. Non-fungible tokens (NFT) are already becoming popular with companies developing assets like rare trading cards, digitized fashion items, and even virtual land.

Indeed, virtual land platforms like Decentraland and The Sandbox have seen massive buy orders from individuals and corporations alike. Earlier in September, crypto exchange behemoth Binance announced the acquisition of over 4,000 LAND tokens which is the native coin of The Sandbox virtual world.

DLT can even offer a bridge that connects different gaming metaverses allowing the transfer of assets across games. Such transfers can even be made seamless once Web 3.0 becomes fully realized.



Continue Reading


US Space Force Uses Blockchain to Bolster Security

Blockchain security firm Xage is taking blockchain technology interstellar in a partnership with the US space force.



In brief

  • The US Space Force has awarded blockchain firm Xage with a cybersecurity contract.
  • Xage’s security protocol will decentralize USSF data systems to ensure maximum uptime and security.
  • the partnership could prove astronomical for blockchain tech adoption.

Blockchain-centric cybersecurity firm Xage has secured a contract to create a decentralized end-to-end protection protocol for the US space force (USSF).

The CyberSec firm will be engaged in securing data across the USSF’s military and civilian assets, with a solution geared to enable granular identity-based verification for access to any USSF system. This includes systems deployed both on earth and in space, regardless of their generation.

“By protecting data across a diverse architecture, commercial operators, and multiple parties, the USSF can create trusted situational awareness in real time, and block various dangerous spoofing or command intrusion attacks,” said a press release.

Originally an arm of the US Air Force, the UFFS became an independent organization at the end of last year. With a mandate to protect the interests of the US in space and accelerate the development of new military space capabilities, the UFFS demands a robust security system.   

Per Xage, the blockchain-protected protocol will distribute and decentralize UFFS data ensuring against single points of failure. As such, even in the case of compromised or disconnected ground resources, UFFS satellites in space will continue to function.

“The USSF requires decentralized enforcement of security to establish space domain resilience and objective situational awareness––across every asset and data element,” Xage CEO Duncan Greatwood said, in a statement. “We built the Xage solution to serve the needs of complex critical infrastructure systems, and are excited to bring the Xage solution to the Space Force in the form of a blockchain-protected space system security,” he added.

It’s one small step for man, one giant leap for blockchain.

Continue Reading